What changed between revision 1 and revision 2, compared over the article's markdown source with its frontmatter — so a change to status, evidence or reversibility shows up as the edit it is.
Older · revision 1
Import· initial corpus import, not an edit
Initial import of content/interventions-testing-program.md — the filesystem corpus, unchanged. Not an edit.
15.0 kB
Revision 1
Revision 2
lines 7–13 → 7–136 unchanged lines not shown
categories: ["organizations", "longevity"]categories: ["organizations", "longevity"]tags: ["aging", "biogerontology", "lifespan", "mice", "drug testing", "replication"]tags: ["aging", "biogerontology", "lifespan", "mice", "drug testing", "replication"]summary: "A National Institute on Aging programme that tests whether candidate anti-aging compounds extend lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice, run in parallel at three sites."summary: "A National Institute on Aging programme that tests whether candidate anti-aging compounds extend lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice, run in parallel at three sites."updated: "2026-08-23"updated: "2026-10-29"------ ```infobox```infoboxlines 25–97 → 25–9411 unchanged lines not shown
}}`````` **The Interventions Testing Program** (ITP) is a programme of the US National Institute on**The Interventions Testing Program** (ITP) is a programme of the US National Institute on AgingAging that tests whether candidate compounds extend the lifespan of mice, running everythat tests whether candidate compounds extend the lifespan of mice, running every test in paralleltest in parallel at three independent sites under an identical protocol. Since its firstat three independent sites under an identical protocol. Since its first cohorts in 2004 it hascohorts in 2004 it has become the closest thing biogerontology has to a benchmark: abecome the closest thing biogerontology has to a benchmark. A lifespan claim that survives the ITPlifespan claim that survives the ITP is taken seriously, and one that fails there isis taken seriously, and one that fails there is substantially weakened however striking the originalsubstantially weakened however striking the original report. Its most consequentialreport. Its most consequential outputs include the 2009 demonstration that [[rapamycin]] extendsoutputs include the 2009 demonstration that [[rapamycin]] extends mouse lifespan whenmouse lifespan when begun late in life, and a long list of famous candidates that did nothing.begun late in life, and a long list of famous candidates that did nothing. ## Overview## Overview The ITP exists because the mouse-longevity literature it inherited was unreliable. AThe ITP exists because the mouse-longevity literature it inherited was unreliable. A lifespan resultlifespan result from one laboratory, in one inbred strain, on one diet, frequently failedfrom one laboratory, in one inbred strain, on one diet, frequently failed to reproduce anywhereto reproduce anywhere else; a compound could look life-extending simply because itelse, and a compound could look life-extending simply because it corrected a quirk of a singlecorrected a quirk of a single genotype. The programme's design answers each failure modegenotype. The programme's design addresses each of these failure modes. Every compound is testeddirectly. Every compound is tested simultaneously at the Jackson Laboratory, thesimultaneously at the Jackson Laboratory, the University of Michigan, and the University of TexasUniversity of Michigan, and the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.Health Science Center at San Antonio. The mice are genetically heterogeneous UM-HET3 animals, bredThe mice are genetically heterogeneous UM-HET3 animals, bred as a four-way cross so thatas a four-way cross so that every mouse is a genetically distinct sibling of every other, whichevery mouse is a genetically distinct sibling of every other, which prevents any resultprevents any result from being an artifact of one inbred genome. Both sexes are tested, doses arefrom being an artifact of one inbred genome. Both sexes are tested, doses are verified inverified in blood, and survival is pooled across the three sites before analysis.[^miller2007]blood, and survival is pooled across the three sites before analysis.[^miller2007] ```keyfacts```keyfacts[[ { "value": "3", "label": "Sites running identical protocols", "note": "The Jackson Laboratory, University of Michigan, UT Health San Antonio" }, { "value": "3", "label": "Sites running identical protocols", "note": "The Jackson Laboratory, University of Michigan, UT Health San Antonio" }, { "value": "2004", "label": "First cohorts enrolled" }, { "value": "2004", "label": "First cohorts enrolled" }, { "value": "9–14%", "label": "Rapamycin gain in age at 90% mortality", "note": "males and females, treatment begun at 600 days" } { "value": "9-14%", "label": "Rapamycin gain in age at 90% mortality", "note": "males and females, treatment begun at 600 days" }]]`````` Anyone may propose a compound. The programme runs an annual open call, and nominationsAnyone may propose a compound. The programme runs an annual open call, and nominations have comehave come from academic laboratories, companies, and independent researchers; the sponsorfrom academic laboratories, companies and independent researchers; the sponsor of a compound isof a compound is typically involved in designing the dose and interpreting the result.typically involved in designing the dose and interpreting the result. The openness is deliberate,This openness is deliberate. The ITP is a public filter for the field's hypotheses,and it makes the ITP a public filter for the field's hypotheses, including the ones its ownincluding the ones its own investigators doubt.investigators doubt. ## History## History The National Institute on Aging launched the programme in 2004, after several years ofThe National Institute on Aging launched the programme in 2004, after several years of planningplanning among investigators who had watched single-laboratory lifespan claims collapseamong investigators who had watched single-laboratory lifespan claims collapse on replication.on replication. The founding design — three sites, heterogeneous mice, pooled analysis,Richard Miller, David Harrison, Randy Strong and colleagues described the founding design (threepre-specified statistics — was described by Richard Miller, David Harrison, Randy Strongsites, heterogeneous mice, pooled analysis, pre-specified statistics) in a 2007 interim report thatand colleagues in a 2007 interim report that remains the reference for how the programmeremains the reference for how the programme works.[^miller2007] Theworks.[^miller2007] The [[methuselah-foundation|Methuselah Foundation's]] Mprize, created[[methuselah-foundation|Methuselah Foundation's]] Mprize, created around the same period, approachedaround the same period, approached the same problem from the opposite direction, rewardingthe same problem from the opposite direction, rewarding record lifespans rather than standardisingrecord lifespans rather than standardising their measurement.their measurement. The programme's defining moment came in 2009, when it reported in *Nature* that rapamycinThe programme's defining result came in 2009, when it reported in *Nature* that rapamycin fed tofed to mice from 600 days of age — roughly equivalent to a human in their early sixties —mice from 600 days of age, roughly equivalent to a human in their early sixties, extended lifespanextended lifespan in both sexes at all three sites.[^harrison2009] It was the first drugin both sexes at all three sites.[^harrison2009] It was the first drug shown to extend mouseshown to extend mouse lifespan robustly when started that late, and the result, anlifespan robustly when started that late. The late start was itself an accident, caused by aaccident of a formulation delay that pushed the start date back, did more than any otherformulation delay that pushed the start date back. The finding did more than any other single resultsingle finding to make aging look pharmacologically tractable. It is a core exhibit forto make aging look pharmacologically tractable. It is a core exhibit for thethe [[geroscience-hypothesis]], and it launched the wave of interest in mTOR inhibition[[geroscience-hypothesis]], and it launched the wave of interest in mTOR inhibition andand [[autophagy]] that continues today.[[autophagy]] that continues today. ## How a compound is tested## How a compound is tested UM-HET3 mice are the offspring of two F1 hybrid parents, drawing on four inbredUM-HET3 mice are the offspring of two F1 hybrid parents, drawing on four inbred grandparentalgrandparental strains. Compounds are almost always delivered in food, at a dose negotiatedstrains. Compounds are almost always delivered in food, at a dose negotiated with the sponsor andwith the sponsor and confirmed by measuring blood levels; treatment usually begins inconfirmed by measuring blood levels. Treatment usually begins in early adulthood, though some agentsearly adulthood, though some agents are deliberately started late to model treatment ofare deliberately started late to model treatment of already-aged animals. The primary endpoint isalready-aged animals. The primary endpoint is survival, pooled across sites and analysedsurvival, pooled across sites and analysed separately by sex, with secondary studies ofseparately by sex, with secondary studies of [[healthspan]] measures and pathology in[[healthspan]] measures and pathology in parallel cohorts.[^miller2007] The design trades breadthparallel cohorts.[^miller2007] The design trades breadth for rigour: a compound isfor rigour. A compound is typically tested at one or a few doses, so a null result is a statementtypically tested at one or a few doses, and a null result is a statement about thoseabout those doses and that schedule, and says nothing about the molecule in every possible regimen.doses and that schedule, not about the molecule in every possible regimen. ## Results## Results lines 109–194 → 106–18211 unchanged lines not shown
]]`````` Two decades of testing have produced a short list of validated life-extending drugs and aTwo decades of testing have produced a short list of validated life-extending drugs and a muchmuch longer list of failures. After rapamycin, the diabetes drug acarbose extendedlonger list of failures. After rapamycin, the diabetes drug acarbose extended lifespan in bothlifespan in both sexes, though far more strongly in males.[^harrison2014] A strikingsexes, though far more strongly in males.[^harrison2014] A striking pattern emerged and haspattern emerged and persisted: 17-α-estradiol, a weakly feminising estrogen isomer,persisted. 17-α-estradiol, a weakly feminising estrogen isomer, extends lifespan only inextends lifespan only in males,[^harrison2021] and the same male-only pattern holds formales,[^harrison2021] and the same male-only pattern holds for canagliflozin,[^miller2020]canagliflozin,[^miller2020] nordihydroguaiaretic acid, and the 2024 additions astaxanthinnordihydroguaiaretic acid, and the 2024 additions astaxanthin and meclizine.[^harrison2024] Why mostand meclizine.[^harrison2024] Why most ITP-positive drugs work better in males is an openITP-positive drugs work better in males is an open question in the field; proposed explanationsquestion in the field, with proposed explanations running from sex differences in drugrange from sex differences in drug metabolism to interactions with growth signalling. In 2026 themetabolism to interactions with growth signalling. In 2026 the programme reported thatprogramme reported that astaxanthin, meclizine and mitoglitazone failed to repeat their benefitsastaxanthin, meclizine, and mitoglitazone failed to repeat their benefits when given atwhen given at different doses or starting ages, which shows that even within mice, dose and timingdifferent doses or starting ages, a reminder that even within mice, dose and timing cancan make or unmake a longevity drug.[^korstanje2026]make or unmake a longevity drug.[^korstanje2026] ## The null results## The null results The negatives are arguably the programme's most valuable product. Resveratrol, theThe negatives are arguably the programme's most valuable product. Resveratrol, the sirtuin activatorsirtuin activator whose promise [[david-sinclair]]'s work had made famous, did not extendwhose promise [[david-sinclair]]'s work had made famous, did not extend lifespan at the doses thelifespan at the doses the ITP tested.[^miller2011] [[metformin|Metformin]] alone did notITP tested.[^miller2011] [[metformin|Metformin]] alone did not significantly extend lifespan insignificantly extend lifespan in either sex — a result that sits awkwardly beneath theeither sex. That result sits awkwardly beneath the TAME trial proposed by [[nir-barzilai]], whichTAME trial proposed by [[nir-barzilai]], which rests substantially on human observationalrests substantially on human observational data rather than mouse survival.[^strong2016]data rather than mouse survival.[^strong2016] Nicotinamide riboside, the most-studied ofNicotinamide riboside, the most-studied of the [[nad-precursors]], had no effect on lifespan inthe [[nad-precursors]], had no effect on lifespan in either sex.[^harrison2021] Fisetin,either sex.[^harrison2021] Fisetin, widely sold as a senolytic supplement, joined the null list inwidely sold as a senolytic supplement, joined the null list in 2024 at the dose and2024 at the dose and schedule used.[^harrison2024] The result matters for how [[senolytics]] claimsschedule used[^harrison2024] — a result that matters for how [[senolytics]] claims areare graded, even though other senolytic agents and regimens remain untested there. Dozens of othergraded, even though other senolytic agents and regimens remain untested there. Dozens ofagents, including green tea extract, curcumin and methylene blue, have likewise shown nothing.other agents, from green tea extract to curcumin to methylene blue, have likewise shownnothing. > [!stat] The base rate> [!stat] The base rate> The large majority of compounds tested since 2004 have produced no significant lifespan> The large majority of compounds tested since 2004 have produced no significant lifespan extension> extension in either sex. Several of the failures — resveratrol, metformin, nicotinamide> in either sex. Several of the failures (resveratrol, metformin, nicotinamide riboside, fisetin)> riboside, fisetin — are among the best-selling ingredients of the longevity supplement> are among the best-selling ingredients of the longevity supplement market.> market. The nulls carry a caveat the programme itself states: a compound tested at one dose, oneThe nulls carry a caveat the programme itself states: a compound tested at one dose, one formulationformulation, and one starting age has not been tested exhaustively. Metformin's advocatesand one starting age has not been tested exhaustively. Metformin's advocates note that the ITP dosenote that the ITP dose produced blood levels below those of treated diabetic humans. Butproduced blood levels below those of treated diabetic humans. The asymmetry still stands. Underthe asymmetry is the point. Under identical conditions rapamycin worked and these agentsidentical conditions rapamycin worked and these agents did not, and a marketplace ofdid not, and a marketplace of [[dietary-supplements]] sold against aging has produced few[[dietary-supplements]] sold against aging has produced few molecules that clear the same bar.molecules that clear the same bar. ## Reception and limits## Reception and limits Within biogerontology the ITP is routinely described as the field's most rigorous test ofWithin biogerontology the ITP is routinely described as the field's most rigorous test of longevitylongevity interventions, and its three-site replication in heterogeneous animals is theinterventions, and its three-site replication in heterogeneous animals is the standard against whichstandard against which single-laboratory claims are discounted. Regulators have nosingle-laboratory claims are discounted. Regulators have no approval pathway for aging, so theapproval pathway for aging, so the programme functions as the de facto arbiter of whichprogramme acts as the de facto arbiter of which compounds deserve human study, informing trialcompounds deserve human study, informing trial design from TAME to the veterinary trialsdesign from TAME to the veterinary trials run by [[loyal]]. Its data are public, its statistics arerun by [[loyal]]. Its data are public, its statistics are pre-specified, and its failurespre-specified, and its failures are published as prominently as its successes, practices that remainare published as prominently as its successes — practices that remain rare in therare in the surrounding literature.surrounding literature. Its limits are equally plain. Mice in specific-pathogen-free housing, fed one diet andIts limits are equally plain. Mice in specific-pathogen-free housing, fed one diet and dying largelydying largely of cancer, are an imperfect model of human aging; effect sizes areof cancer, are an imperfect model of human aging. Effect sizes are percentages of apercentages of a two-to-three-year lifespan, not steps towardtwo-to-three-year lifespan, not steps toward [[maximum-human-lifespan|record human lifespans]]. And[[maximum-human-lifespan|record human lifespans]]; and lifespan itself is a bluntlifespan itself is a blunt endpoint that can miss what a compound does to function. The programmeendpoint that can miss what a compound does to function. The programme measures survivalmeasures survival superbly and mechanism not at all, which is why its results are read alongside thesuperbly and mechanism not at all, which is why its results are read alongside the[[hallmarks-of-aging]] framework and validated [[aging-biomarkers]] rather than in place of them.[[hallmarks-of-aging]] framework and validated [[aging-biomarkers]] rather than in placeof them. > [!key] The best mouse evidence is still mouse evidence> [!key] The best mouse evidence is still mouse evidence> The ITP is what makes the rule "animal results are not human results" enforceable with> The ITP makes the rule "animal results are not human results" enforceable with data, because it> data: it defines what a real mouse result looks like. No ITP finding, positive or> defines what a real mouse result looks like. No ITP finding, positive or negative, establishes> negative, establishes anything about human aging, and no compound the programme has> anything about human aging, and no compound the programme has validated has been shown to slow> validated has been shown to slow aging in people.> aging in people. ## Outlook## Outlook The programme's current direction is toward combinations and refinements: rapamycin plusThe programme is now moving toward combinations and refinements. In results reported in 2022,acarbose outperformed either drug alone in males, and the ACE inhibitor captoprilrapamycin plus acarbose outperformed either drug alone in males, and the ACE inhibitor captoprilproduced a modest extension, in results reported in 2022.[^strong2022] A companion NIAproduced a modest extension.[^strong2022] A companion NIA effort applies the same multi-site logiceffort applies the same multi-site logic to *Caenorhabditis* worms, and proposals keepto *Caenorhabditis* worms, and proposals keep arriving faster than the three sites can test them.arriving faster than the three sites can test them. The unresolved question is the oneThe unresolved question is one the ITP was never designed to answer.the ITP was never designed to answer. [[caloric-restriction|Caloric restriction]],[[caloric-restriction|Caloric restriction]], rapamycin and acarbose all extend mouse lifespan underrapamycin, and acarbose all extend mouse lifespan under its protocol, yet no human trialits protocol, yet no human trial has demonstrated that any drug slows human aging, and none of thehas demonstrated that any drug slows human aging, and none of the programme's male-onlyprogramme's male-only results has an accepted explanation. Much of the longevity field, fromresults has an accepted explanation. Whether the ITP's short list of validated compoundscompanies and trials to off-label use, currently rides on the wager that the ITP's short list oftranslates into human healthspan is the wager on which much of the longevity field —validated compounds translates into human healthspan.companies, trials, and off-label use alike — currently rides. ## See also## See also removed, struck through added, underlinedLine numbers count the serialised markdown of each revision, frontmatter included.
100 lines are the same in both revisions, and 49 of them are not shown. Neither revision here is necessarily the current article — read Interventions Testing Program for the text this wiki stands behind today.