What changed between revision 1 and revision 2, compared over the article's markdown source with its frontmatter — so a change to status, evidence or reversibility shows up as the edit it is.
Older · revision 1
Import· initial corpus import, not an edit
Initial import of content/stentrode.md — the filesystem corpus, unchanged. Not an edit.
11.8 kB
Revision 1
Revision 2
lines 7–14 → 7–146 unchanged lines not shown
trl: 6trl: 6categories: ["cybernetics"]categories: ["cybernetics"]tags: ["bci", "endovascular", "implants", "paralysis", "als", "neurotechnology"]tags: ["bci", "endovascular", "implants", "paralysis", "als", "neurotechnology"]summary: "An endovascular brain–computer interface in which a stent carrying electrodes is delivered through the jugular vein into a vein overlying the motor cortex."summary: "An endovascular brain-computer interface in which a stent carrying electrodes is delivered through the jugular vein into a vein overlying the motor cortex."updated: "2026-07-27"updated: "2026-10-29"humanEvidence: "A small number of people with severe paralysis, mostly from ALS, have used the implant for discrete computer control over months to years; the published safety series covers four Australian participants."humanEvidence: "A small number of people with severe paralysis, mostly from ALS, have used the implant for discrete computer control over months to years; the published safety series covers four Australian participants."access: "Investigational only: implants have been placed solely within the SWITCH and COMMAND feasibility studies at a handful of centres, with no market authorisation anywhere and nothing on sale."access: "Investigational only: implants have been placed solely within the SWITCH and COMMAND feasibility studies at a handful of centres, with no market authorisation anywhere and nothing on sale."reversibility: "difficult"reversibility: "difficult"lines 30–68 → 30–6815 unchanged lines not shown
}}`````` **Stentrode** is a brain–computer interface built into a self-expanding stent. Rather than opening**Stentrode** is a brain-computer interface built into a self-expanding stent. Instead of openingthe skull, a neurointerventional radiologist threads the device through the jugular vein and intothe skull, a neurointerventional radiologist threads the device through the jugular vein into thethe superior sagittal sinus, the large vein running along the midline of the brain, where itsuperior sagittal sinus, the large vein running along the midline of the brain, where it expandsexpands against the vessel wall directly above motor cortex. Electrodes on the stent record corticalagainst the vessel wall directly above motor cortex. Electrodes on the stent record corticalactivity through the vein wall; a lead runs under the skin of the neck to a telemetry unit implantedactivity through the vein wall, and a lead runs under the skin of the neck to a telemetry unitin the chest, which transmits wirelessly to an external computer.implanted in the chest, which transmits wirelessly to an external computer. The design trades signal quality for surgical accessibility. With sixteen electrodesThe design gives up signal quality in exchange for surgical accessibility. Its sixteen electrodesrecording population-level activity rather than individual neurons, the Stentrode captures far lessrecord population-level activity rather than individual neurons, so the Stentrode captures far lessinformation than a penetrating [[utah-array]]. It also requires no craniotomy, uses catheterinformation than a penetrating [[utah-array]]. It also needs no craniotomy, relies on cathetertechniques that thousands of clinicians already practise, and does not place foreign material intechniques that thousands of clinicians already practise, and places no foreign material in thethe brain parenchyma.brain parenchyma. ## How it works## How it works The stent is a nitinol mesh of the type used for treating venous stenosis, with electrode contactsThe stent is a nitinol mesh of the type used to treat venous stenosis, with electrode contactsmounted on its struts. Delivered collapsed inside a catheter, it self-expands on release andmounted on its struts. It is delivered collapsed inside a catheter, self-expands on release, andpresses the electrodes against the endothelium. Over the following weeks the vessel wallpresses the electrodes against the endothelium. Over the following weeks the vessel wallincorporates the stent — the same endothelialization that makes vascular stents stable, and whichincorporates the stent. This is the same endothelialization that makes vascular stents stable, andhere fixes the electrodes in position without sutures or bone anchors.here it fixes the electrodes in position without sutures or bone anchors. Signals reach the electrodes through the vein wall, which acts as a spatial filter. The resultSignals reach the electrodes through the vein wall, which acts as a spatial filter. What the deviceresembles what surface arrays record in [[ecog-interfaces]] but with fewer, larger, and morerecords resembles the output of the surface arrays used in [[ecog-interfaces]], but with fewer,distant contacts: local field potentials and band power, not action potentials. Participantslarger and more distant contacts: local field potentials and band power rather than actiongenerate control signals by attempting movements — typically of a foot or ankle, since the legpotentials. Participants generate control signals by attempting movements, typically of a foot orrepresentation of motor cortex sits along the midline nearest the sagittal sinus — and a decoderankle, since the leg representation of motor cortex sits along the midline nearest the sagittalmaps the resulting change in band power to a discrete output the company calls a digital motorsinus. A decoder maps the resulting change in band power to a discrete output that the company callsoutput, essentially a click.a digital motor output, which is essentially a click. Because one reliable click is not enough to run a computer, the system is used with eye tracking orOne reliable click is not enough to run a computer, so the system is used with eye tracking orswitch-scanning software: gaze selects the target, the neural signal confirms it. Thisswitch-scanning software: gaze selects the target and the neural signal confirms it. The division ofdivision of labour is deliberate. The [[neural-decoding]] problem is much easier when the decoderlabour is deliberate. The [[neural-decoding]] problem is much easier when the decoder only has toonly has to distinguish attempted movement from rest.distinguish attempted movement from rest. ```compare```compare{{lines 70–76 → 70–761 unchanged line not shown
"rows": [ "rows": [ { "label": "Procedure", "values": ["Catheter via jugular vein", "Craniotomy and cortical insertion"] }, { "label": "Procedure", "values": ["Catheter via jugular vein", "Craniotomy and cortical insertion"] }, { "label": "Signal type", "values": ["Local field potentials", "Single-unit spikes and LFP"] }, { "label": "Signal type", "values": ["Local field potentials", "Single-unit spikes and LFP"] }, { "label": "Electrodes", "values": ["16", "96–1,024"] }, { "label": "Electrodes", "values": ["16", "96-1,024"] }, { "label": "Accessible cortex", "values": ["Tissue adjacent to large veins", "Any surgically reachable area"] }, { "label": "Accessible cortex", "values": ["Tissue adjacent to large veins", "Any surgically reachable area"] }, { "label": "Demonstrated output", "values": ["Discrete selection", "Continuous multi-dimensional control, speech"] }, { "label": "Demonstrated output", "values": ["Discrete selection", "Continuous multi-dimensional control, speech"] }, { "label": "Removal", "values": ["Difficult once endothelialized", "Possible, at the cost of repeat surgery"] } { "label": "Removal", "values": ["Difficult once endothelialized", "Possible, at the cost of repeat surgery"] }lines 80–167 → 80–1673 unchanged lines not shown
## Development history## Development history The concept came from Thomas Oxley and Nicholas Opie's group at the University of Melbourne, whoThe concept came from Thomas Oxley and Nicholas Opie's group at the University of Melbourne. Theyreasoned that the cerebral venous system already reaches within millimetres of cortex and thatreasoned that the cerebral venous system already reaches within millimetres of cortex, and thatcatheter delivery would avoid the complication profile of open neurosurgery. A 2016 report in sheepcatheter delivery would avoid the complication profile of open neurosurgery. A 2016 report in sheepshowed that an endovascular array could record cortical activity chronically, with signal qualityshowed that an endovascular array could record cortical activity chronically, with signal qualitythat remained usable as the stent incorporated into the vessel wall.[^oxley2016] [[synchron]] wasthat remained usable as the stent was incorporated into the vessel wall.[^oxley2016] [[synchron]]founded to commercialize the device.was founded to commercialize the device. The first-in-human study, SWITCH, implanted the device in four participants with severe paralysis,The first-in-human study, SWITCH, implanted the device in four participants with severe paralysis,mostly from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, at the Royal Melbourne Hospital beginning inmostly from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, at the Royal Melbourne Hospital beginning in 2019. The2019. The published results reported no device-related serious adverse events, no vessel occlusion,published results reported no device-related serious adverse events and no vessel occlusion, andand participants able to use the system for texting, email, and online banking in combination withparticipants were able to use the system with eye tracking for texting, email and onlineeye tracking.[^oxley2021][^mitchell2023] A United States early feasibility study, COMMAND, began inbanking.[^oxley2021][^mitchell2023] A United States early feasibility study, COMMAND, began in 20222022 with the first implant at Mount Sinai in New York, and the company has reported that itswith the first implant at Mount Sinai in New York, and the company has reported that its primaryprimary safety endpoint was met.safety endpoint was met. ```timeline```timeline[[ { "year": "2016", "title": "Chronic recording in sheep", "text": "An endovascular stent-electrode array records cortical activity for months, published in Nature Biotechnology." }, { "year": "2016", "title": "Chronic recording in sheep", "text": "An endovascular stent-electrode array records cortical activity for months, published in Nature Biotechnology." }, { "year": "2019–2021", "title": "SWITCH first-in-human study", "text": "Four participants with severe paralysis receive implants in Australia; the trial reports no device-related serious adverse events." }, { "year": "2019-2021", "title": "SWITCH first-in-human study", "text": "Four participants with severe paralysis receive implants in Australia; the trial reports no device-related serious adverse events." }, { "year": "2022", "title": "First US implant", "text": "The COMMAND early feasibility study begins at Mount Sinai under an FDA investigational device exemption." }, { "year": "2022", "title": "First US implant", "text": "The COMMAND early feasibility study begins at Mount Sinai under an FDA investigational device exemption." }, { "year": "2023–2025", "title": "Integration with consumer platforms", "text": "Synchron demonstrates control of commercial voice assistants and announces work with major computing platforms on native input support for neural devices." } { "year": "2023-2025", "title": "Integration with consumer platforms", "text": "Synchron demonstrates control of commercial voice assistants and announces work with major computing platforms on native input support for neural devices." }]]`````` ## Clinical results and limits## Clinical results and limits What participants have demonstrated is real but narrow: reliable discrete selection sufficient forParticipants have demonstrated something real but narrow: reliable discrete selection sufficient forcommunication and device control, sustained over months to years, in people who otherwise depend oncommunication and device control, sustained over months to years, in people who otherwise depend oneye-gaze systems that fail when eye movement deteriorates. That is a meaningful clinical benefiteye-gaze systems that fail when eye movement deteriorates. For a population with few options, thatfor a population with few options.is a meaningful clinical benefit. What has not been demonstrated is continuous high-dimensional control. Nothing resembling theContinuous high-dimensional control has not been demonstrated. No endovascular device has producedrobotic-arm work or the fluent [[speech-neuroprosthesis]] results obtained with penetratinganything resembling the robotic-arm work or the fluent [[speech-neuroprosthesis]] results obtainedarrays[^willett2023] has come from an endovascular device, and there is a physical reason to expectwith penetrating arrays,[^willett2023] and there is a physical reason to expect the gap to persist.that gap to persist. Speech motor cortex lies on the lateral surface of the brain, far from the sagittalSpeech motor cortex lies on the lateral surface of the brain, far from the sagittal sinus. Thesinus; the venous anatomy determines which cortex is reachable, and it does not reach everywhere.venous anatomy determines which cortex is reachable, and it does not reach everywhere. Driving aDriving a wheelchair or a powered [[exoskeleton]] would likewise require continuous multi-axiswheelchair or a powered [[exoskeleton]] would likewise require continuous multi-axis control that acontrol that a click cannot supply.click cannot supply. > [!debate] Bandwidth versus access> [!debate] Bandwidth versus access> Synchron's argument is that a device a vascular surgeon can implant in an ordinary catheter lab> Synchron argues that a device a vascular surgeon can implant in an ordinary catheter lab scales to> scales to a patient population that craniotomy never will, and that reliable simple control> a patient population that craniotomy never will, and that reliable simple control covers most of> covers most of the clinical need. Critics respond that sixteen field-potential channels cap the> the clinical need. Critics respond that sixteen field-potential channels cap the device below the> device below the applications that justify an implant at all, and that the comparison should be> applications that justify an implant at all, and that the right comparison is with non-invasive> against non-invasive eye trackers rather than against penetrating arrays.> eye trackers rather than with penetrating arrays. Other limitations follow from the vascular setting. The device is difficult to remove once the veinOther limitations follow from the vascular setting. The device is difficult to remove once the veinwall has grown over it. Participants need antiplatelet therapy, at least initially, and venouswall has grown over it. Participants need antiplatelet therapy, at least initially, and venousthrombosis or stenosis remains the principal safety concern even though the published studies didthrombosis or stenosis remains the principal safety concern even though the published studies didnot observe it. Long-term stability data extend to a few years across a small number ofnot observe it. Long-term stability data extend to a few years in a small number of participants,participants, which is not enough to characterize rare complications.which is not enough to characterize rare complications. ## Strategy and context## Strategy and context Synchron has positioned the Stentrode against both invasive and non-invasive alternatives. ComparedSynchron has positioned the Stentrode against both invasive and non-invasive alternatives. Comparedwith [[neuralink]] and other penetrating systems, it accepts a much lower ceiling in exchange for awith [[neuralink]] and other penetrating systems, it accepts a much lower ceiling in exchange for aprocedure that generalists can perform. Compared with [[non-invasive-neuromodulation]] andprocedure that generalists can perform. Compared with [[non-invasive-neuromodulation]] andscalp-electrode devices, it offers a stable, always-available signal that does not require setup orscalp-electrode devices, it offers a stable signal that is always available, needs no setup, and istolerate hair and sweat artefacts.not exposed to hair and sweat artefacts. The company has also pursued integration with mainstream computing platforms, so that a neuralThe company has also pursued integration with mainstream computing platforms, so that a neuraldevice appears to an operating system as an input source alongside touch and voice. If thatdevice appears to an operating system as an input source alongside touch and voice. If thatstandardization takes hold, it would matter beyond any one device: the persistent complaint fromstandardization takes hold, its effect would extend beyond any one device, because the persistentusers of assistive [[neuroprosthetics]] is that the hardware works and the software ecosystem doescomplaint from users of assistive [[neuroprosthetics]] is that the hardware works and the softwarenot.ecosystem does not. ## Outlook## Outlook The obvious next step is a pivotal trial in a defined indication — loss of communication in ALSThe obvious next step is a pivotal trial in a defined indication that could support marketbeing the clearest — that could support market authorization. No implanted BCI has cleared thatauthorization, with loss of communication in ALS the clearest candidate. No implanted BCI hasbar anywhere, and the Stentrode's low channel count may actually help, because a simpler devicecleared that bar anywhere. The Stentrode's low channel count may help here, because a simpler devicewith a simpler claim is easier to evaluate. The regulatory precedents that exist are forwith a simpler claim is easier to evaluate. The existing regulatory precedents are for stimulatingstimulating devices such as the [[cochlear-implant]] and [[deep-brain-stimulation]] systems, wheredevices such as the [[cochlear-implant]] and [[deep-brain-stimulation]] systems, where thethe therapeutic claim is a change in symptoms rather than a measured rate of communication.therapeutic claim is a change in symptoms rather than a measured rate of communication. The unresolved technical question is whether channel count can grow. Multiple stents, longer arraysThe unresolved technical question is whether channel count can grow. Multiple stents, longer arraysextending further along the sinus, and improved electrode materials have all been proposed. Whetherextending further along the sinus, and improved electrode materials have all been proposed. It hasany of that lifts an endovascular interface out of the switch-like regime, or whether the vein wallnot been established whether any of these lifts an endovascular interface out of the switch-likeimposes a hard ceiling on what can be resolved, has not been established. As with every implantedregime, or whether the vein wall imposes a hard ceiling on what can be resolved. As with everyneural device, the governance questions — data ownership, [[mental-privacy]], device supportimplanted neural device, the governance questions arrive before the clinical ones are settled: dataobligations, the [[neurorights]] frameworks now emerging in several jurisdictions — arrive beforeownership, [[mental-privacy]], obligations to support the device, and the [[neurorights]] frameworksthe clinical ones are settled.now emerging in several jurisdictions. ## See also## See also removed, struck through added, underlinedLine numbers count the serialised markdown of each revision, frontmatter included.
111 lines are the same in both revisions, and 44 of them are not shown. Neither revision here is necessarily the current article — read Stentrode for the text this wiki stands behind today.